Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-17

SANGAM VIHAR VIKAS MANCH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-6466/2013 2025:DHC:9371-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANGAM VIHAR VIKAS MANCH
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 (SPL. DB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6466/2013 SANGAM VIHAR VIKAS MANCH .....Petitioner Through: versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv, Mr. Shubham, Adv along with Mr. Deepak Trehan, DGHS, HQ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 17.10.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. REVIEW PET. 209/2024 & CM APPL. 28104/2024 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the original petitioner Sangam Vihar Vikas Manch, though it was represented on the last two dates of hearing. 2. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the review petitioner-GNCTD, submits that, owing to various operational and technical hurdles, it is not possible to construct a hospital at the land in question. However, he submits, on instructions, that an Ayushman Arogya Mandir can be constructed on the said land and also submits that every effort would be made to ensure that construction takes place Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6466/2013 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:28.10.2025 10:29:07 and is completed and that the Ayushman Arogya Mandir is functional within a period of six months from today. 3. We record the statement made to the above effect. 4. In our mind, no practical purpose is served keeping this review petition pending any further. 5. Binding the review petitioner to the statement made in Court today, we close this review petition. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. ANISH DAYAL, J. OCTOBER 17, 2025 dsn Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6466/2013 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:28.10.2025 10:29:07

SANGAM VIHAR VIKAS MANCH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS · Niyam