SABU TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED vs RAJKUMAR SABU & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.10.2025 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 61/2024 SABU TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant versus RAJKUMAR SABU & ANR. .....Respondents + FAO(OS) (COMM) 62/2024 CM APPL. 18111/2024 CM APPL. 51018/2024 CM APPL. 55947/2024 CM APPL. 23757/2025 KAUSHALYA DEVI SABU & ORS. .....Appellants versus RAJKUMAR SABU .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. J Sai Deepak, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, Mr. Luv Virmani, Ms. Ananya Sanjiv Saraogi, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Chander Lall, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Ms. Samridhi Bhatt and Ms. Ananya Mohan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. 1. In FAO (OS) (COMM) 62/2024, the appellant no. 1 is Kaushalya Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRADEEP FAO(OS) (COMM) 61 & 62 of 2024 Page 1 of 51 SHARMA Signing Date:13.10.2025 15:48:46 Devi Sabu. The appellant no. 2 is Gopal Sabu and the appellant no. 3 is Sabu Trade Private Limited („STPL‟), incorporated on 05.05.1993, wherein the appellants no. 1 and appellant no. 2 are Directors. The respondent i.e., Mr. Rajkumar Sabu and appellant no. 2 are sons of (Late) Smt. Chandrakanta Sabu (mother). In FAO (OS) (COMM) 61/2024, the appellant is STPL and the respondent no.1 is Rajkumar Sabu. For the purpose of convenience, we shall refer to the parties as per FAO (OS) (COMM) 62/2024. 2. The present appeals arise from the common order dated 05.03.2024 („impugned order‟) passed by the learned Single Judge, granting interim injunction in favour of the respondent and against the appellants in relation to the trade mark „SACHAMOTI‟ and label in CS (COMM) No. 761/2016 and CS(COMM) No. 97/2020 whereby