RUCHITA GANESH KOLAMBKAR vs SHRIKRUSHN CHANDRAHAS KOLABKAR

Judgment text excerpt

KVM 1/6 60 - MCA 32 OF 2025.doc Digitally signed by KANCHAN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR VINOD Date: MAYEKAR 2025.10.14 20:14:27 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2025 Ruchita Ganesh Kolambkar ) Age : 37 Years, ) Mukam Post Shipur, Vai Nesari, ) Taluka Gadhinlaj, District Kolhapur ) ….. Applicant/ Org. Respondent VERSUS 1) Shrikrushn Chandrahas Kolabkar) Age – 54 Years, ) 2) Santosh Chandrahas Kolambar ) Age – 46 Years ) Room No. 305, Sai Samarth Apartment) Omkar Nagar, Diva Purv, ) Maharashtra – 400 612 ) ….. Respondents/ Org. Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Dhadam for the Applicant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 6 OCTOBER, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1) Mr. Dhadam, learned advocate for the applicant submits that in the Order dated 29 September, 2025, in para no.3, it has been wrongly mentioned that the applicant is staying with “one daughter and two sons”. He submits that infact, the applicant was staying with two sons. After death of her husband, daughter, was illegally taken KVM 2/6 60 - MCA 32 OF 2025.doc into the custody by her brother-in-laws and during the pendency of this transfer proceeding, even one son has been illegally abducted by the respondents. A complaint to that effect has been filed with the police. 2) Mr.Dhadam further submits that the respondents have been duly served with the court notice and also by a private notice of the advocate and affidavit of service dated 4 April, 2025 has already been filed. 3) None appears for the respondents when the matter is called out, though served. It seems respondents do not want to appear in the present proceedings. Hence, I proceed further to hear the proceedings in absence of the respondent. 4) This is a petition filed by the applicant who is a