RENU TORA vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 27.10.2025 + CRL.REV.P. 107/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9052/2025 RENU TORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Gupta, Ms. Richa Mishra, Ms. Simran wason, Mr. Akhil G. Kurup, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of the present revision petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 23.12.2024 [hereafter „impugned order‟], passed by the learned Additional and Sessions Judge (POCSO), North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Trial Court‟], whereby the learned Trial Court had framed charge against the petitioner for commission of offence punishable under Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [hereafter „JJ Act‟], in SC No. 393/2022, arising out of FIR No. 230/2022, registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, Delhi. CRL.REV.P. 107/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:27.10.2025 18:12:38 2. As set out in the petition, it is the petitioner‟s case that she is a social activist and runs an NGO in Rohini, Delhi. It is stated that she has dedicated her life to social welfare and the upliftment of underprivileged communities, but has been falsely implicated in the present case. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the FIR had been registered on 29.01.2022 on the complaint of the victim „X‟. In her complaint, the victim alleged that about two years prior to the registration of the FIR, one Bahadur, who was her brother in relation, had taken her from her village to Ranchi, Jharkhand for work. Thereafter, he had sent her along with one Firoz (co-accu