RAKESH SHARMA vs VIKRAM SARASWAT

Judgment text excerpt

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 10.10.2025 + C.R.P. 50/2024 & CM Appl. 7026/2024 RAKESH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Veer Singh, Ms. Smriti Singh, Mr. Vishal Singh and Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advs. versus VIKRAM SARASWAT .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the order dated 07.11.2023 passed by the learned Trial Court [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the learned Trial Court has dismissed the objection raised by the Petitioner/judgment debtor regarding non-payment of the amounts due. 2. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Respondent submits the order which is subject matter of challenge in this proceedings, was also subject matter of challenge in another Petition being CRP 55/2024 captioned Rakesh Sharma v. Arvind Saraswat and by an order dated 29.07.2025, this Court had dismissed the Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not deny the same. However, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:13.10.2025 C.R.P. 50/2024 Page 1 of 4 19:09:28 he deems to re-argue the matter. 4. This Court had on 29.07.2025 in CRP 55/2024 after examining the matter passed the following directions: “2. By the Impugned Order, the learned Trial Court has, after examining the contention of the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor, which were made in respect of the settlement agreement dated 14.09.2022 entered into between the parties [hereinafter referred to as the “Settlement Agreement”], dir