Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-17

RACHNA BANSAL & ORS. vs COMMISSIONER OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-16319/2022 2025:DHC:9305
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RACHNA BANSAL & ORS.
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.10.2025 W.P.(C) 16319/2022 RACHNA BANSAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None versus COMMISSIONER OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Yadav, SC for MCD Mr. Ramesh N. Keswani and Mr. Pranav Singal, Advs. for R-6 & 7 (Through VC) Ms. Meghna Mital, Adv. and Ms. Vanita Jangra, Adv. for DDA (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent nos. 1 to 5, to take action against the encroachments in Sector 24, Rohini, New Delhi-110085, caused by Shri Ram Mandir and Delhi Tour & Travel upon Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”) Park existing between Pocket 3 & 4, and common road connecting Pocket-3 Sector 24 to the said DDA Park. 2. A short affidavit dated 28th November, 2024, has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), relevant portions of which, are reproduced as under: 3. Perusal of the aforesaid Short Affidavit shows that the matter has already been referred to the Religious Committee, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (“GNCTD”) for