Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-13

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 426 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 426 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 426 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 426 of 2025 Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parth Goswami, Pramod Kumar Singh, Yogesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Ramanand Pandey (A.C.S.C.), Krishna Agarawal Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition was filed seeking direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the objections filed by the petitioner under the EIA Notification, 2006 before deciding the application filed by respondent No. 3. 2. Submissions have been made that though the application made by respondent No. 3 has been decided, objections filed by the petitioner have not been considered. 3. Once the application has been decided by competent authority, the petitioner has to take appropriate proceedings qua the said order, in accordance with law. 4. Insofar as the present petition is concerned, the same has been rendered infructuous. 5. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (Kshitij Shailendra,J.)

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 426 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam