Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-30

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 21444 of 2017 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 21444 of 2017 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 21444 of 2017 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 21444 of 2017 Dhoom Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. Sugar Industries And Cane .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Asit Srivastava, Akhilesh Kumar Kalra, Arvind Khare, Sushil Kumar, Vaibhav Srivastava, Vinod Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deeptiman Singh, Devansh Bharadwaj, Nav Preet Ahluvalia, Neerav Chitravanshi, Paramanand Asthana Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. The counsel for the petitioner says that cane dues for the period 2017-18 have been paid, but interest on the belated payment has not been paid by the concerned sugar mill, i.e. opposite party no.5, which has moved an application before the Cane Commissioner for waiver of interest under Section 17 (3) of U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1953'). Now the controversy has narrowed down only to the issue as to whether interest payable by the opposite party no.5 to the cane growers is required to be waived or not. This decision has to be taken by the Cane Commissioner under sub-secti

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 21444 of 2017 at Lucknow · Niyam