Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-09

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1060 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1060 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1060 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1060 of 2025 Bhoopram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Shivendra Singh Suryavans Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Mishra Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri I.M. Pandey, Advocate on behalf of opposite party No. 9 is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Nagar Palika says that earlier the charge of Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Palia, Lakhimpur Kheri was with the Sub Divisional Magistrate who had passed the order dated 26.5.2025 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is under challenge in this PIL. Subsequently, on appointment of a regular Executive Officer, an appeal has been preferred against the said order. 4. As the said order is under challenge in a statutory appeal, there is no reason for us to entertain this PIL at this stage. 5. Let the appellate authority/court consider and dispose of the appeal of the Nagar Palika if it is in accordance with Rules, as per

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 1060 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam