Delhi High Court · 2025-10-30
PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED vs UJALA GOEL PROPRIETOR OF R U OVERSEAS
- Citation / case number
- RFA(COMM)-109/2024 2025:DHC:9481-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED
- Respondent
- UJALA GOEL PROPRIETOR OF R U OVERSEAS
Judgment text excerpt
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: 30.10.2025 + RFA(COMM)109/2024 PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED ..... APPELLANT Versus UJALA GOEL PROPRIETOR OF R.U. OVERSEAS ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Sachin Jain, Mr. Ajay Agarwal, Mr.Shobhit Jain, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Kailash Chand Goel, Ms. Rashmi Verma, Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT VINOD KUMAR, J. 1. This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 13 (1A) of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is directed against a judgment and decree dated 31.01.2024 passed by learned District Judge (Commercial Court-10), Central District, Delhi in civil suit CS (COMM.) No. 3436/2021. The suit RFA (COMM) 109/2024 Page 1 of 20 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:03.11.2025 13:31:53 was decreed in favour of the respondent and against the appellant for a sum of Rs.38,94,070/- with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 15 percent per annum and costs. 2. Notice of this appeal was issued to respondent, who contested the appeal. For the sake of convenience, the appellant would also be referred to as ‘defendant’ and respondent as ‘plaintiff’. 3. The plaintiff had filed civil suit no. 3436/2021 pleading that he is in business of trading various chemicals and the defendant is a leading manufacturer and dealer of herbal medicines under its trademark ‘Patanjali’. The plaintiff had been supplying various chemicals to the defendant since 2014. The details of the invoices of goods supplied to the defendant from 12.04.2020 till 20.08.2020 and the details of payments received from the defendant against the said invoices have been given in para 7