Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-10

NISHANT MUKUL vs NISCHAL AGGARWAL

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-642/2020 2025:DHC:9023
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NISHANT MUKUL
Respondent
NISCHAL AGGARWAL

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 10.10.2025 + CRL.M.C. 642/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2674/2020 + CRL.M.C. 643/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2686/2020 + CRL.M.C. 656/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2724/2020 + CRL.M.C. 657/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2728/2020 + CRL.M.C. 660/2020 & CRL.M.A. 2737/2020 NISHANT MUKUL .....Petitioner Through: versus NISCHAL AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr. Amit Sinha, Mr. Prince Kumar, Ms. Amrita Vats, Mr. Ankit Vashisht & Mr. Satyam Sharma, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Siddharth Khattar, Mr. Divij Andley, Mr. Sanket Kumar & Mr. Gaurav Raj Sharma through VC. CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) seeking quashing of the summoning orders dated 17.02.2017 in Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHIKHA SEHGAL CRL.M.C. 642/2020 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 Signing Date:11.10.2025 16:42:13 Complaint Case Nos. 9489/2017 and 9492/2017, 06.09.2017 in Complaint Case Nos. 13653/2017 and 13674/2017 and 16.10.2017 in Complaint Case No. 14166/2017. The petitioner also seeks the consequential relief of quashing of the aforesaid complaint cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘NI Act’) read with Sections 141/142 of the NI Act. 2. Briefly stated, it is the case of the respondent/complainant that he is the sole proprietor of M/s Shree Krishna Grit Company which is engaged in the business of trading cement, maurang, bajri, river sands and grit. It is alleged that the accused company approached the company of the respondent and placed certain purchase orders with it. 3. It is alleged that th

NISHANT MUKUL vs NISCHAL AGGARWAL · Niyam