NAGHMA ZAHOOR vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30.10.2025 + W.P.(C) 13395/2025 & CM APPL. 54884/2025 NAGHMA ZAHOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. K. Malviya and Mr.Shakil Ahmed, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Dr.Divya Swamy, SC, Mr.Yagyawalkya Singh, Ms.Akriti Singh, Ms.Ananya Y, Advs. for R-1. Mr.S.M.Arif, Mr.S.M. Aatif, Ms.Shabnam Perween, Advs. for Atifa Tasleem CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 11.03.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A No. 4014/2017, titled Naghma Zahoor v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors. and O.A. No.259/2017, titled, Atifa Tasleem v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors., and further seeking a direction to the respondent to allow the petitioner to Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 13395/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:01.11.2025 14:52:14 join the post of Medical Officer (Unani). 2. Insofar as the challenge to the Order passed in O.A. No.259/2017 is concerned, this Court, by its Judgment dated 01.09.2025, passed in W.P.(C) No. 13304/2025, titled Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Atifa Tasleem, 2025:DHC:7680-DB, has dismissed the writ petition filed by the MCD challenging the said order. 3. We also find that the petitioner has not been able to make out any ground to challenge the said order insofar as O.A. No. 259/2017 is concerned. 4. Coming to the Impugned Order passed in O.A. No.4014/2017, the said O.A. was filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “a) Quash the impugned order dated 01.02.2017 of t