MUMTAZ H KHOJA vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRA AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

sns osrpw-18-2025-J.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.773 OF 2023 Mumtaz H. Khoja ] adult, Indian inhabitant, ] residing at A-314, 3 floor, ] Rizvi Nagar CHSL, S.V. Road, ] Santacruz West, Mumbai 400054. ] … Petitioner. V/s. 1. The Chief Executive Officer, ] Slum Rehabilitation Authority, ] Bandra, Mumbai 400051. ] 2. M/s. Pioneer India Developers ] Pvt. Ltd., ] having office at Shastri Nagar, ] Santacruz West, Mumbai 400054. ] … Respondents. ______________________________________ Mr. Aseem Naphade a/w. Adv. Saurabh Utangale, Adv. Vedant Joshi i/by Adv. Rohan Sawant for the Petitioner. Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal i/by R.S. Justicia Law Chambers for Respondent No.1-SRA. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Adv. Mayur Singh, Adv. Santosh Pathak, Adv. Deepesh Kadam for Respondent No.2. _____________________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. RESERVED ON : 15th September, 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 16th October, 2025. Judgment (Per : Kamal Khata, J) :- 1) By this Review Petition, the Petitioner seeks review of the Order dated 8th February, 2024 based on the liberty granted by the Digitally signed by SUMEDH SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE 1/12 NAMDEO SONAWANE Date: 2025.10.17 10:12:05 +0530 sns osrpw-18-2025-J.doc Hon’ble Supreme Court by its order dated 23 rd August, 2024. The Supreme Court granted liberty to the Petitioner (i) to bring to the notice of this Court her personal claim considering the reliefs sought, and (ii) to challenge the Order to be passed in the Review Petition before the Supreme Court. 2) Mr. Naphade, learned counsel for the Review Petitioner, submits that, in the Writ petition (which came to be dismissed), the Petitioner had sought (a) a direction to t