MS DROPADI vs MS RINKI VERMA

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 30.10.2025 + C.R.P. 289/2025 MS DROPADI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus MS RINKI VERMA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (ORAL) CM APPL. 65550/2025 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 65552/2025 (for condonation of 61 days’ delay in filing of the petition) The petitioner seeks condonation of 61 days’ delay in filing the civil revision petition, which has been filed through the Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed, and the delay is condoned. C.R.P. 289/2025 & CM APPL. 65551/2025 (for stay) 1. The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in a civil suit [CS SCJ 586/2024, pending before the Court of the learned Civil Judge-03, South- West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi], assails an order of the Trial Court dated 13.05.2025, by which her application under Order XII Rule 6 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PARUL C.R.P. 289/2025 Page 1 of 8 VASHIST Signing Date:01.11.2025 19:31:10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”] was dismissed. 2. The respondent [defendant in the suit] was married to the son of the petitioner on 21.04.2008. The marriage was dissolved by mutual consent, by a judgment of the Family Court dated 14.01.2020, on the basis of an undated settlement deed, attested on 26.03.2019. 3. The case of the petitioner in the suit is that she is owner in possession of the suit property [Plot No. 95, measuring 100 sq. Yards in Khasra No. 136/11, 139/15/2 in the revenue estate of Dichaun Kalan, New Delhi, also known as Suraksha Enclave, New Delhi-110043]. She claims that, after the dissoluti