Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-14

MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. vs GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD.

Citation / case number
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)-38/2025 2025:DHC:9326
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
Respondent
GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD.

Judgment text excerpt

$~93-95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 14.10.2025 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 38/2025 & I.A. 12346/2025 MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Adv , Mr. Shashwat Kabi, Adv , Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh. Adv, Mr. Adhishwar Suri Adv and Mr. Vaibhav Gandhi Adv and Mr. Kartikay Puneesh Adv versus GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Sapre, Mr. Abhijeet Swaroop, Mr. Vinam Gupta, Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advs. 94 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 39/2025 &I.A. 12348/2025 MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Adv , Mr. Shashwat Kabi, Adv , Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh. Adv, Mr. Adhishwar Suri Adv and Mr. Vaibhav Gandhi Adv and Mr. Kartikay Puneesh Adv versus GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Sapre, Mr. Abhijeet Swaroop, Mr. Vinam Gupta, Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advs. 95 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 40/2025 & I.A. 12350/2025 MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Adv , Mr. Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 38/2025, 39/2025, 40/2025 Page 1 of 30 By:MAYANK Signing Date:23.10.2025 17:20:04 Shashwat Kabi, Adv , Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh. Adv, Mr. Adhishwar Suri Adv and Mr. Vaibhav Gandhi Adv and Mr. Kartikay Puneesh Adv versus GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Sapre, Mr. Abhijeet Swaroop, Mr. Vinam Gupta, Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH : JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL) 1. These are petitions filed under Section 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the seeking substitution and/or appointment of an Arbitrator and/ or pass an order enabling the Arbitrator to continue proceedings. 2. The brief facts are that the projects relating to erection, tes

MECWEL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. vs GE POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. · Niyam