Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-17

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 9445 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 9445 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 9445 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

AFR Reserved on 13.10.2025 Delivered on 17.10.2025 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9445 of 2025 Smt. Santosh Jain and 2 others …..Petitioner(s) Versus Kewal Kishore and another …..Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Agrawal, Harsh Vardhan Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pankaj Agarwal Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Petitioners, before this Court, are judgment-debtors whose objection filed under Section 47 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) was rejected and revision filed, thereafter, has also been dismissed. 2. Facts, leading rise to present petition, are that one Late Aatma Ram was tenant of Shop No. 13/1091 situated in Bazar Fazalganj, Saharanpur. Respondent no. 1, Kewal Kishore, the decree-holder instituted a S.C.C. Suit No. 64 of 1978 for arrears of rent and ejectment. On 01.12.1981, he executed Power of Attorney in favour of his father Gurudas Mal for contesting the suit, filing vakalatnama, filing of affidavit appointing advocate etc. The suit was decreed on 13.08.1993. Against the said judgment, a S.C.C. revision was filed which was also dismissed on 22.08.1994. The matter travelled upto Hon’ble Supreme C

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 9445 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam