Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-29

MALINI DAHIYA vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-3069/2025 2025:DHC:9435
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MALINI DAHIYA
Respondent
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT)

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 29.10.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3069/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1728/2025 FOR GRANT OF INTERIM ANTICIPATORY BAIL MALINI DAHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Ms. Pallavi Hooda, Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Mr. Utkarsh Bhukkal, Ms. Tannu, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastav, APP SI Rahul Malik, PS Maurya Enclave. Ms. Kadambari Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Ms. Kopal Yadav, Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Mr. Arjun Singh, Mr. Rahul Parashar, Mr. Akshay Chauhan, Mr Praweer Singh, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. BAIL APPLN. 3069/2025 Page 1 of 11 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:29.10.2025 19:17:01 1. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 232/2025 under Sections 406/420/120B IPC registered at P.S. Maurya Enclave. Brief facts: 2. The FIR was registered on the complaint of Satbir Chikara, who alleged that accused Amardeep Dahiya, his wife Malini Dahiya, and father Abhey Ram Dahiya induced him to advance a loan of over ₹2.40 crores between 2017–2018 by assuring repayment, transfer of residential plots at Panchkula, and partnership in their businesses. Despite execution of agreements to sell dated 18.09.2017 and further assurances through agreements in 2018 and 2024, the accused neither repaid the loan nor transferred the properties, which were already mortgaged and later sold to third parties. It is further alleged that the accused siphoned off amounts meant for ASD Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. for personal use, and through dishonest misrepresentations and conspiracy cheated the complainant, causing wrongful loss of about Rs. 6.37 c

MALINI DAHIYA vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) · Niyam