M/S PINEAPPLE INFRA PROJECTS LTD vs SANTOSH KAUR & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on 31.10.2025. + C.R.P. 113/2019 and CM APPL. 22701/2019 (for stay) M/S PINEAPPLE INFRA PROJECTS LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu A Walia, Mr. Aryan Malik and Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Advocates. versus SANTOSH KAUR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarun Diwan, Mr. Dheeraj Kr. Singh, Mr. Rashim and Mr. Rakesh Kr. Dudeja, Advocates for R1. Mr. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Roopanshi Batra, Advocates for R3 to R11. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 [“CPC”], the petitioner, who is impleaded as defendant No. 18 in Civil Suit No. 47/20161 pending before the Court of learned Additional District Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, assails an order dated 18.02.2019, by which its application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. 2. The suit is one for partition of immovable property bearing No. 1 Sardar N. Kirpal Singh (Deceased) Through LRs vs. Smt. Kanwal Raj Kaur & Ors. Signature Not Verified Signed By:PARUL C.R.P. 113/2019 Page 1 of 11 VASHIST Signing Date:03.11.2025 17:24:37 2/54, Original Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi [“the suit property”]. It was originally filed before this Court as Civil Suit (OS) No. 554/1988, by one Sardar N. Kirpal Singh against various members of his family. 3. The petitioner was subsequently impleaded, by an order dated 17.07.2017, on an application filed by it under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC. The petitioner had sought impleadment on the basis that it is the owner of the suit property, which had been transferred to it by a registered sale deed dated 01.02.2012, executed by one S. Parnvat Singh, [respondent No. 24 herein]. S. Parnvat Singh, who had earlier been implead