KHUSHWANT KAUR vs SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 28th August, 2025 Pronounced on: 16th October, 2025 + CRL.REV.P. 219/2021 KHUSHWANT KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Hatneimawi, Advocates. versus SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU .....Respondent Through: Ms. Samvedna Verma, Advocate. + CRL.REV.P. 223/2021 DALJIT SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Hatneimawi, Advocates. versus SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU .....Respondent Through: Ms. Samvedna Verma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J. 1. Both these revision petitions arise out of disputes concerning the same property and rest on common factual foundations. As the grounds urged and the submissions addressed on either side are identical in substance, they are being decided together by this judgment. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.REV.P. 219/2021 & CRL.REV.P. 223/2021 Page 1 of 19 By:NITIN KAIN Signing Date:16.10.2025 21:23:56 Factual Background 2. The Respondent in both petitions, Gagandeep Sidhu, got married to Saravjeet Singh, the son of the Petitioners, namely Khushwant Kaur (mother-in-law) and late Daljit Singh (father-in-law), on 14th November, 2010 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. After marriage, Gagandeep Sidhu moved into her matrimonial home at House No. 11/8, Gali No. 1 & 2, Old Gobindpura Extension, Delhi-1100511. However, the matrimonial relationship soon deteriorated, giving rise to disputes between her and the Petitioners. 2.1. The Petitioners contend that owing to marital discord and differences, the Respondent along with her husband, Saravjeet Singh, initially began living at the ground floor of the matrimonial home. However, the continued strain in their relationship led the couple to move out of the matrimonial home