HITESH KUMAR vs UNIVERSITY OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 09.10.2025 + W.P.(C) 13759/2025 and CM APPL. 56418/2025 HITESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra and Ms. Mayuri Lende, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, a candidate belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC) category, who appeared in the CUET PG Examination held on 26.03.2025 for the purpose of seeking admission to LL.M. course for the Academic Year 2025-26. 2. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner has secured 167 marks in the CUET PG Examination. 3. The grievance which has been articulated by the petitioner is that at the time of Spot Round III of admissions, the respondent/University did not upload the public notice on dedicated ‘PG Admission’ tab of its website where earlier notices had consistently been posted. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 13759/2025 Page 1 of 6 By:DEEPAK SINGH Signing Date:11.10.2025 05:25:39 4. The petitioner appearing in person submits that on the home page of the said website, a dedicated tab for PG admission is provided where all previous notifications were uploaded. 5. He further submits that on the same home page, after scrolling down, there is also a place for notification for PG applicants, where the notification of Spot Round III was published. 6. He submits that earlier at both the above mentioned places, all notifications such as cut-offs, details of vacant seats and prior spot rounds were published. 7. He further submits that a total of 21 notifications had been issued on the dedicated page as well as the