Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-15

GIRIRAJ SINGH YADAV vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-15892/2025 2025:DHC:9313
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
GIRIRAJ SINGH YADAV
Respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

Judgment text excerpt

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15th October, 2025 + W.P.(C) 15892/2025 GIRIRAJ SINGH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. C. Mittal, Mr. Yugansh Mittal and Mr. Keshav Poonia, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMSSIONER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh, ASC with Ms. Bharti Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent for de-sealing of the property bearing Plot No. 272, Net Ram Market, Naharpur Village, Rohini Sector-7, Delhi-110085. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks de-sealing of the said shop, since the same is lying sealed in pursuance of the order dated 04th October, 2018, passed by the National Green Tribunal (“NGT”) in O.A. No. 435/2016, titled as “N S Yadav & Ors. Versus Commissioner, North MCD & Ors.”. 3. It is submitted that the order passed by the NGT was with regard to stopping the activities of servicing, repairing, denting, painting and junk dealing, etc. being carried out by various unauthorized car-shops in the area in question. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA W.P.(C) 15892/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signing Date:17.10.2025 22:49:47 4. However, it is submitted that as far as the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner was only carrying out sale and storage of car accessories which is not a polluting activity. Thus, it is submitted that despite the aforesaid, the respondent authorities sealed the premises of the petitioner, purportedly in compliance of the NGT order dated 14th October, 2018. 5. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by a similar writ petition, i.e., W.P.(C) 8818/2023,

GIRIRAJ SINGH YADAV vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER · Niyam