Delhi High Court · 2025-10-13
GHULAM HASNAIN vs MCD & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-15694/2025 2025:DHC:9159
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- GHULAM HASNAIN
- Respondent
- MCD & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th October, 2025 + W.P.(C) 15694/2025 & CM APPL. 64178/2025 GHULAM HASNAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suhail Khan, Ms. Vratika Mittal and Mr. Farid Ahmad Nizami, Advs. Mob: 9711190303 Email: [email protected] versus MCD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Adv. for R-MCD (Through VC) Email: [email protected] Mr. Syed Husain Adil Taqui, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, G.P. for R-Delhi Police (Through VC) Mob: 8178303621 Email: [email protected] Ms. Himanshi, S.I., PS Jama Masjid Mob: 9350659627 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (Oral): 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to stop the on-going illegal and unauthorized construction in property bearing No. 930, Chhatta Shah Ji, Chawri Bazar, Delhi-110006. 2. Responding to the present writ petition, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), submits that the premise of Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 1 of 3 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:15.10.2025 09:02:08 filing the present writ petition is that the petitioner claims to be one of the co-owners, of the property in question. However, no such documents have been placed on record. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the MCD further submits that pursuant to the complaint received, a Work Stop Notice dated 08th October, 2025 was issued. One Ms. Alka Jain was found to be carrying out the construction work in the property in question. He submits that Ms. Alka Jain has given an undertaking that repair work shall be carried out only in terms of what is permissible under the Unified Building Bye-Laws for Delhi, 2016 (“UBBL, 2016”). 4. He submits that the M