FARUKH QURESHI PHARUK vs STATE OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO WELCOME POLICE STATION & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 30th October, 2025 + W.P.(CRL) 3434/2025 FARUKH QURESHI PHARUK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Azeem Mehmood Alvi and Mr. MD Qaisar Alvi, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO WELCOME POLICE STATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) withy Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates For R-1 Mr. Shashank Sharma and Mr. Anshul Kumar, Advocates for R-5, R-6 & R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN JUDGMENT 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 B.N.S.S., 2023 and petitioner, inter alia, seeks directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus to the respondents to produce his missing wife i.e. Ms. Simran Qureshi who has, allegedly, been illegally detained by the respondent no. 5 and 6 (parents of Ms. Simran) and their family members at their residence in Dhaulpur, Rajasthan. 2. Petitioner claims to have married Ms. Simran on 11.09.2025 as per Islamic rites and rituals at Hazrat Nizamuddin East, New Delhi - 110013. 3. Thereafter, they started living together at Kabir Nagar, North East Delhi - 110094. When they informed their families, Ms. Simran’s parents allegedly reacted violently and threatened to kill both Ms. Simran and the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 3434/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:01.11.2025 16:21:46 petitioner. Subsequently, they softened their stance and accepted the marriage. Some days later, the father and brother of Ms. Simran came to Delhi and took Ms. Simran to Rajasthan with the promise that she would return to Delhi after a week. 4. Since then, the petitioner has been unable to establish any contact with Ms. Simra