DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD vs MAFISH

Judgment text excerpt

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 16.10.2025 + W.P.(C) 8048/2025 & CM APPL. 35261/2025 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. versus MAFISH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rathi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 2412/2019, titled Ms. Mafish v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board, Secretary & Ors., allowing the said O.A. filed by the respondent herein with the following direction: “20. Given the above, the OA is allowed with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant under vacancy notice dated 26.06.2018 for the post of Teacher (Primary) while treating the CTET certificate dated 04.01.2019 as a valid certificate. The applicant be considered as per her merit and in case, she is otherwise fit, she be offered the said post with notional benefits. The aforesaid exercise be completed within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of Signature Not Verified Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 8048/2025 Page 1 of 7 NEGI Signing Date:17.10.2025 20:54:39 this OA.” 2. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the petition has been taken up for disposal at this stage itself. 3. The petitioner had issued an advertisement on 26.06.2018, inter alia inviting applications for recruitment to the post of Teacher (Primary) in the MCD under Post Code 1/18, in supersession of the vacancy notice for the Post Code 16/17 issued on 07.08.2017. The advertisement