Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-28

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9414 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9414 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9414 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9414 of 2025 Zulfikar @ Kallu .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hirdesh Kumar Yadav, Saurabh Pandey, Sushma Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shaurya Sharma Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the victim in her both statements has made specific allegation against the applicant for committing her rape, but at the trial the victim (P.W.2) in her testimony has not made any allegation of rape against the applicant and she has not supported the prosecution case, which statement has been filed as Annexure No. S.A.1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 22.07.2025, which is on the record. Thus, it is argued that there is bleak chance that prosecution may prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and the applicant may be convicted. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applica

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9414 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam