CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 820 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 820 of 2025 Bheemsen .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Janardan Prasad Tripathi, Ram Raj Pandey, Shubham Pandey, Srijana Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj, Rakesh Kumar Agrahari Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears for the informant. Heard Sri Janardan Prasad Tripathi and Sri Ramraj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W.1-victim was recorded and she has not supported the prosecution version, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-SA1 to the supplementary affidavit. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed