Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-29

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35811 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35811 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35811 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35811 of 2025 Pradeep Maddheshiya .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Narain Pathak, R.K.Paramhans Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Divyansh Rai, G.A. Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Manvendra Narain Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Divyansh Rai, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.214 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 61(2)(A) B.N.S., Police Station Bankata, District Deoria, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in the present case. His name has come up for the first time on the basis of an information received from a squealer and subsequently three witnesses have been roped in by the prosecution, namely, Firoz Ahmad, Prafull and Vishesh Kumar Maddheshiya, who are stated to have seen the applicant at the place of occurrence. 5. Le

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35811 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam