Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-28

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35200 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35200 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35200 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35200 of 2025 Karan Varma .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rama Pati Tripathi Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sudhakar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rama Pati Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Shyam Dhar Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 163 of 2025, under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 191(2), 191(3), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station - Sen Pashim Para, District - Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. He is not named in the FIR. His name has come up in the confessional statement of two co-accused persons, one of whom is named in the FIR. The said statements have no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. 5. Learned counsel h

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35200 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam