Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-16

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25673 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25673 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25673 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25673 of 2025 Suraj Panwar @ Bhura .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Sonu Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anurag Pathak, G.A., Harshit Pathak, Sumit Goyal Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sumit Goyal and Sri Anurag Pathak, learned counsels for the informant as well as Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 105 of 2025, under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station - Rampur Maniharan, District - Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. He is not named in the FIR. His name has come up in his own confessional statement before police. Even the recovery of alleged CMP has been shown from

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25673 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam