CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22969 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22969 of 2025 Anil Pathak .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma, G.A., Ram Babu Sharma Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W.1-informant and P.W. 2-victim were recorded and they have not supported the prosecution version, copy of their statements are annexed as Annexure-SA1 and SA2 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, accordin