Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-14

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21408 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21408 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21408 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21408 of 2025 Anil .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears on behalf of informant despite service of notice. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is named in the F.I.R. along with two other accused. The F.I.R. alleges that all the accused named in the F.I.R. including the applicant committed rape of the minor daughter of the informant. Learned counsel further submits that though the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 & 183 B.N.S.S. has made specific allegation against all the accused including the applicant, but during course of trial she adduced her evidence as P.W.2 wherein she has not supported the prosecution version by stating that Bharat, Anil (applicant) and Sonu neither enticed her nor committed her rape, which statement has been filed as Annexure No. S.A.1 to the supplementary

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21408 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam