CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19439 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19439 of 2025 Shoaib .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhushan Tiwari, Rajneesh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears for the informant inspite of service of notice. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W.1-victim has been recorded and she has not supported the prosecution version, certified copy of which statement has been produced before this Court and is taken on record, which is marked as "X". He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, acc