CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1336 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1336 of 2025 Somveer .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Jatan Yadav, Shivajee Srivastava, Sudhir Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. List revised. None appears on behalf of informant despite service of notice. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that though the victim who is informant in the F.I.R. as well as in her statements recorded under Section 180 & 183 B.N.S.S. has made allegation against the applicant that he established sexual relations with her on false pretext of marriage, but during course of trial the victim (P.W.1) in her cross examination has not supported the prosecution case and she has been declared hostile by the concerned trial court. A copy of evidence adduced by the victim at the trial is annexed as Annexure-S.A.1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 06.08.2025, which is on the record. Thus, it is argued that there is bleak chance that prosecution