Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-28

ASI(M) SADHNA vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-16323/2025 2025:DHC:9459-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ASI(M) SADHNA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 16323/2025, CM APPL. 66818/2025 & CM APPL. 66819/2025 ASI(M) SADHNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Mayank Chauhan and Mr. Prabhav Pachauri, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Lakra CGSC, Mr. Aditya Kashyap GP Mr Vinod Sawant Law Officer CRPF, Insp Athurv CRPF, Mr Ramniwas Yadav CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 28.10.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J 1. The petitioner assails her transfer from Jharoda Kalan, New Delhi to Pinjore. 2. The grounds urged by Mr. Aggarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, to sustain the challenge, are that (i) the petitioner is presently participating in an inquiry following allegations of sexual harassment made by her against her senior officer, (ii) her children are school going and the academic session is ongoing presently and (iii) the petitioner has family support in Delhi. 3. To our mind, these considerations cannot constitutes legitimate grounds on the basis of which we could interdict the petitioner’s transfer. 4. The petitioner is an employee of a para-military force. Courts have