AJAY NARAIN vs AARTI SINGH & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 09.09.2025 Judgment pronounced on:28.10.2025 + RFA(OS) 13/2025 and CM APPL. 13604/2025 AJAY NARAIN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Walia, Mr. Aryan Malik, Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Vanya Chhabra and Mr. Bhavesh Seth, Advs. versus AARTI SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw and Ms. Sagarika Kaul, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Bharat Arora, Mr. Gourav Arora and Ms. Himangi Arora, Advs. for R-2. + RFA(OS) 14/2025, CM APPL. 13640/2025 and CM APPL. 48088/2025 AJAY NARAIN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Walia, Mr. Aryan Malik, Mr. Kamakshraj Singh, Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Ms. Vanya Chhabra and Mr. Bhavesh Seth, Advs. versus AARTI SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw and Ms. Sagarika Kaul, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Bharat Arora, Mr. Gourav Arora and Ms. Himangi Arora, Advs. for R-2. Signature Not Verified Signed By:SAVITA PASRICHA RFA(OS) 13/2025 and connected matter Page 1 of 30 Signing Date:28.10.2025 14:52:02 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟] read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, the Appellant assails the correctness of the judgment dated 02.12.2024 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Judgment‟] passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. Having regard to the fact that the two suits emanate from identical issues and in view of the consent expressed by learned counsel for the parties, the Appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. BRIEF FACTUAL MATRIX: 3. In order to comprehend the issues i