Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-18

WRIT - C No. 1004000 of 2006 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1004000 of 2006 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1004000 of 2006 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004000 of 2006 Ram Khelawan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P.Through Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bajrangi Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jyotinjay Verma Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. A.F.R. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional CSC for respondent - State. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the orders dated 27.07.2006 passed by respondent No.2 in Revision No.148 of 2005- 2006 under Section 333 of UPZA&LR Act and judgment and order dated 12.04.2006 passed by respondent No.3 in case No.25 of 2005-06 under Section 122-B of UPZA&LR Act contained as Anneuxre Nos.1 and 2 to the writ petition. 3. Factual matrix of the case is that father of the petitioner namely late Babulal was owner of the house in suit prior to abolition of Zamindari and as per provision of Section 9 of UPZA&LR Act, 1950 the land in suit was settled with the house of the owner namely late Babulal - father of the petitioner and since then father of the petitioner was in continuous possession till his life and after the death

WRIT - C No. 1004000 of 2006 at Lucknow · Niyam