Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-11-11

WRIT - C No. 1001660 of 2003 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1001660 of 2003 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1001660 of 2003 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW A.F.R. WRIT - C No. - 1001660 of 2003 Daya Ram Objection Filed .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P.Through Collector Sitapur. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Kishore Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Pandey, Kapil Kumar Srivastava, R.N.Gupta Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vimal Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.P. Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Dilip Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.5. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing he impugned judgment and order dated 16.4.2003, passed by opposite party No.2, Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Lucknow Division, Lucknow in Revision No.405 of 1996-97 under Section 333-A of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, contained at Annexure No.10 to the writ petition, and impugned order dated 24.1.1997 passed by opposite party No.3, Appar Collector, Sitapur in Case No.31/36/48/104 Under Section - 198(4) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, contained at Annexure No.8 to the

WRIT - C No. 1001660 of 2003 at Lucknow · Niyam