WRIT - A No. 20558 of 2024 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 20558 of 2024 Deepak Chowrasia .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shambhavi Tiwari, C.S.C., Rohit Pandey A.F.R Court No. - 32 ORAL ORDER. HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Chowrasia, petitioner in person and Sri Rohit Pandey on behalf of respondents. 2. Court is repeatedly facing difficulty in dealing cases of petitioners appearing in person since their writ petitions invariably remains defective. Even averments made therein are not proper, since they are unaware of law and procedure and normally they refuse to take services of an Amicus Curaie. 3. Due to lack of proper assistance even though Court gave patient hearing, interest of justice suffers. 4. It is necessary to observe that there is no bar for petitioner in person to file a petition and to argue their case. In some case they argue better than any qualified Advocate, but it is an exception. 5. The present case is also an example of such defective writ petition. On one hand petitioner wants to quash an order, whereby his contractual appointment was e