VISHAL CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 01.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 7250/2025 & CRL.M.A. 30428/2025 EXEMPTION, CRL.M.A. 30427/2025 INTERIM RELIEF VISHAL CHAUDHARY. ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sahiba Singh, Advocate. Petitioner through VC. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. … Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP. SI Sargam, PS-Adarsh Nagar. Mr. Harshit Gupta, Mr. Dilip Garg, Advocate for complainant/R-2. Respondent No. 2 through VC. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 801/2022, dated 07.08.2022, registered at P.S Adarsh Nagar, Delhi under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/120B IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 7250/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:03.11.2025 12:37:04 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the respondent no. 2/complainant had supplied FMCG goods, including cigarettes and pan masala, worth ₹1,55,38,576/-.( Rupees One Crore Fifty Five Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Six Only) to petitioner who later defaulted on payments by fabricating and uploading fake GST invoices to create a fictitious liability against respondent no. 2. FIR No. 801/2022 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 at PS Adarsh Nagar under sections 406/ 420/ 467/ 468/471/120B IPC against the petitioner. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of settlement were written in the form of a Settlement Agreement dated 15.09.2025. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 has paid the entire sett