Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-17

VIJENDER TANWAR vs GIRWAR (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH AGENT/LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ANAND TYAGI & ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-220/2023 2025:DHC:10093
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VIJENDER TANWAR
Respondent
GIRWAR (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH AGENT/LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ANAND TYAGI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 11.11.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 17.11.2025 + CM(M) 220/2023, CM APPL. 74752/2024 & CM APPL. 6608/2023 VIJENDER TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Mahima Chauhan, Ms. Anamika Tyagi and Ms. Sneha, Advocates. versus GIRWAR (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH AGENT/LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ANAND TYAGI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapur, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajive Bhalla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.S. Verma and Mr. Divyansh Misra, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner, a stranger to the injunction suit has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail order dated 15.11.2022 of the learned trial court, whereby application of the petitioner for being impleaded as a party under Order I Rule 10 CPC in the subject suit pending since the year 1992 was dismissed. The present respondent no.1 is the legal CM(M) 220/2023 Page 1 of 15 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 Digitally Signed 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA By:NEETU N NAIR Date: 2025.11.17 10:36:17 -08'00' Signing Date:17.11.2025 10:48:13 representative of the now deceased plaintiff while the present respondent no.2 is the defendant of the subject suit. I have heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of each of the parties. 2. Briefly stated, circumstances relevant for present purposes are a

VIJENDER TANWAR vs GIRWAR (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH AGENT/LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ANAND TYAGI & ANR. · Niyam