Delhi High Court · 2025-11-24
TESLA INC. vs TESLA POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- CS(COMM)-353/2024 2025:DHC:10367
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- TESLA INC.
- Respondent
- TESLA POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 24/11/2025 + CS(COMM) 353/2024 TESLA INC. .....Plaintiff Versus TESLA POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghav Malik, Ms. Nancy Roy, Ms. Prakriti Varshney, Mr. Lalit Alley, Ms. Annanya & Mr. Prashant, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Abhishek Kotnala, Mr. Kartikeya Tandon & Mr. Avinash Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J I.A. 9755/2024 (U/O XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present Suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from using the Marks ‘TESLA POWER’ / Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 353/2024 Page 1 of 52 Signed By:NEELAM SHARMA Signing Date:26.11.2025 19:14:49 ‘TESLA POWER USA’, ‘ ’ and ‘ ’ (“Impugned Trade Marks”) and / or any other deceptively similar marks including the domain names www.teslapowerusa.com, www.Teslapowersusa.in, www.Teslapowerusa.ae and www.Teslahealthylife.com (“Impugned Domain Names”). 2. Vide Order dated 02.05.2024, the statement of Defendant No. 3 made on behalf of the Defendants that the Defendants have no intention to manufacture Electronic Vehicles (“EVs”) at all and will not market other entities’ EVs as well under the Impugned Marks and the Trade Name ‘TESLA POWER USA’ and or any other brand deceptively similar or use the word ‘TESLA’ was taken on record and the Defendants were directed to be bound by the said statement. 3. Vide Order dated 30.05.2024, the learned Senior Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that the Defendants were not abiding by the undertaking given by the Defendant No. 3