SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN vs KIRAN CHADHA

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 06, 2025 % Pronounced on: November 26, 2025 + RC.REV. 476/2019 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate Versus KIRAN CHADHA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Uppal, Ms. Ruchita Uppal, Mr. Mohit Dewan and Mr. Utkarsh Batra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. The respondent/ landlady1 instituted an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 19582 before the ACJ/CCJ/ARC(west), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi3 seeking eviction of the petitioner/ tenant4 from Haryana Bearings, shop no.1 at property bearing no. C-213/6, Ground Floor, Mayapuri, Phase-II, New Delhi5. 2. Succinctly put, it was the case of the landlady before the learned ARC that her husband, Sh. Sita Ram Chadha was allotted a plot bearing no.213/6, admeasuring 211 sq. yards, Block-C, Mayapuri Industrial Area, 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘landlady’ 2 Hereinafter referred to as ‘DRC Act’ 3 Hereinafter referred to as ‘learned ARC’ 4 Hereinafter referred to as ‘tenant’ 5 Hereinafter referred to as ‘subject premises’ RC.REV. 476/2019 Page 1 of 8 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:26.11.2025 17:35:12 Phase-II, New Delhi6 vide a perpetual Lease Deed dated 14.05.1991, wherein the subject premises is situated which was let out to the tenant for commercial purposes at a monthly rent of Rs.400/- excluding electricity charges. After the death of her husband, all the other legal heirs of Sh. Sita Ram Chadha executed a registered Relinquishment Deed dated 26.06.2013 in respect of the property in favour of the landlady. Therefore, the landlady became the sole owner of the property, including the sub