STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. vs ANNU

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22.11.2025 + W.P.(C) 14159/2024 & CM APPL. 59272/2024 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Vinay Yadav, CGSC with Ms.Kamna Behrani, Mr.Ansh Karla and Mr.Neeraj Paulose Raj, Advs. versus ANNU .....Respondent Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 14.05.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No.1032/2024, titled Annu v. Staff Selection Commission & Ors., whereby the said O.A. filed by the respondent herein was allowed with the direction to the petitioners to conduct a re-medical examination of the respondent, in terms of the learned Tribunal’s earlier Order dated 10.05.2024, passed in O.A. 519/2024, titled Teekaram Singh Meena v. SSC & Ors. 2. To give a brief background of the facts in which the present petition arises, the respondent had applied for the post of Constable Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 14159/2024 Page 1 of 4 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:27.11.2025 11:05:02 (Executive) (Female) in the Delhi Police pursuant to the Notice for recruitment issued by the petitioners on 01.09.2023. 3. Having cleared the Computer Based Examination, the respondent was subjected to a Detailed Medical Examination (‘DME’). The DME Board declared her ‘unfit’ for appointment with the remark ‘left upper thigh keloid 5 x 0.5 cm’. 4. Aggrieved by the same, she applied for a Review Medical Examination (‘RME’). The RME Board also, by its Report dated 29.01.2024, declared the respondent unfit for appointment with the following remarks: “5 x 5