SPECIAL APPEAL No. 217 of 2019 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 217 of 2019 State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Madhyamik Shiksha And Ors .....Appellant(s) Versus Raj Kumar Singh And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Lalit Kishore Tiwari, Nitesh Yadav Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. After hearing Ms. Isha Mittal, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Nitesh Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 what comes out is that the writ petition was decided only on the basis of written instructions received by the State Counsel without calling for a detailed counter affidavit by the State which has been directed to pay salary to the respondent no.1 from the State Exchequer, the institution in question being on grant-in-aid list. Further we find that the Committee of Management was also not represented before the writ court. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 says that it was not put to notice. 3. The allegation in the appeal is about fictitious and fraudulent documents having been prepared and interpolated. 4. Without going into the merits of th