SHRI SURENDER BASOYA vs SHRI SANJEEV JOON

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 13.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 27.11.2025 + RFA(OS)(COMM) 33/2025 and CM APPL. 64365/2025 SHRI SURENDER BASOYA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. versus SHRI SANJEEV JOON .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh K. Daksh, Adv. + RFA(OS)(COMM) 14/2024, CM APPL. 34784/2024 and CM APPL. 30512/2025 SURENDER BASOYA & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. versus SANJEEV JOON .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh K. Daksh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGEMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeals, the Appellants assail the correctness of common judgement dated 04.03.2024 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Judgement‟] passed by the learned Single Judge [hereinafter referred to as „LSJ‟], wherein two separate suits Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN RFA(OS)(COMM)14/2024& 33/2025 Page 1 of 19 Signing Date:27.11.2025 17:40:56 filed by the Respondent [Plaintiff before the learned Single Judge], were decreed. 2. Since, the parties to the disputes are common, as is the Impugned Judgement, this Court deems it appropriate to deliver a common judgement with bifurcation of both the Appeals wherever necessary, while referring to the parties in the same manner. 3. For sake of convenience, the parties before this Court shall be referred to in accordance with their status before the LSJ. COMMON FACTUAL MATRIX: 4. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, it is imperative to cull out the relevant background facts, which are set forth hereinafter. 5. While filing the suits and the interim applications under Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟] the