SHRI SONAL JHA @ BENGALI vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 26, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4122/2025 SHRI SONAL JHA @ BENGALI .....Applicant Through: Mr. P.N. Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State SI Saurabh, PS- Shalimar Bagh SI Rajesh Kumar, PS- Vijay Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. 1. The present application is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 368/2023 dated 05.06.2023 registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh for offences under Sections 324/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). 2. Briefly stated, the FIR was registered pursuant to the allegation that the complainant/victim’s mobile phone was robbed and serious injuries were inflicted on him with a sharp- edged weapon, on 05.06.2023, by three assailants, aged between 18-20 years. 3. Consequently, the aforementioned FIR was registered and the applicant was arrested on 11.06.2023. 4. After completion of the investigation the chargesheet was Signature Not Verifiedfiled against the accused under Sections 341/307/394/397/411/34 Signed By:DEEPANSHU Signing Date:26.11.2025 20:45:27 BAIL APPLN. 4122/2025 Page 1 of 6 of the IPC. 5. Vide Order dated 05.02.2024, the charges have been framed under Sections 324/341/307/394/397/34 of the IPC. 6. The third Bail Application, seeking regular bail, was preferred by the applicant, which was dismissed by the learned ASJ vide Order dated 25.09.2025. 7. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no public witness in this case nor there is any CCTV footage to establish the role of the applicant. 8. He submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed and the weapon of offence i.e. knife was not recovered from the applicant. Further, even the FSL resu