SH. JAI KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 29th October, 2025 Pronounced on: 06th November, 2025 + CRL.M.A. 19086/2022 in W.P.(CRL) 72/2021 JAI KUMAR GUPTA S/o Late Gajanand Gupta R/o 58, Antriksh, North-South Road No. 12, JVPD Scheme, Juhu Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400059 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Javed Ahmed, Mr. Inyant Ahmad and Ms. Aakriti Aditya, Advocates versus 1. THE STATE (GNCT of Delhi) 2. SH. KAMAL KUMAR GUPTA S/o Late Sh. Gajanand Gupta R/o 13/42, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi-l10026 .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CRL.M.A. 19086/2022 1. The Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the recalling of the Order dated 15.01.2021 in W.P.(CRL) No. 72/2021, whereby FIR No. 0227/2020 under Sections 120B/ 379/ 406/ 419/ 420/ 424/ Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:RITA CRL.M.A. 19086/2022 in W.P.(CRL) 72/2021 Page 1 of 11 SHARMA Signing Date:06.11.2025 18:36:12 465/ 467/ 468 IPC and the IT Act was quashed in terms of a Family Settlement dated 31.07.2019. 2. It is submitted in the Application that the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2/Applicant had requested the quashing of the FIR based on the Family Settlement dated 31.07.2019, followed by Settlement Deeds dated 27.11.2019 and 03.11.2020 executed between the parties. The parties had stated that they would remain bound by the terms of the Settlement. Consequently, the Writ Petition was allowed, and the FIR was quashed. 3. It is submitted that in terms of the Family Settlement dated 27.11.2019, Respondent No. 2 transferred Shop No. 66, opposite Hudda Shopping Complex, Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana, in January 2022, and also handed over the pos