Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-20

SANJAY KHURANA vs INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-17379/2025 2025:DHC:10242-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJAY KHURANA
Respondent
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 20.11.2025 W.P.(C) 17379/2025 SANJAY KHURANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Ms Shreya Sethi, Advs. Versus INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC, Ms. Naincy Jain, JSC, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR V. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 71737/2025(exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 17379/2025 CM APPL. 71736/2025 3. This petition lays a challenge to an order passed on 05.08.2025 rejecting, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) seeking condonation of delay of nine months in filing the revised Income Tax Return (ITR). 4. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) has dismissed the application by stating in paragraph 5.1, 5.2 and 6 of the order as under: “5.1. The delay can be condoned for filing of ROI, if it is prevented by sufficient cause and it has caused genuine hardship to the assessee. As far as, the issue of prevented by sufficient cause is c