Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-11-13

SANGEETA vs HITESH KUMAR

Citation / case number
RFA-589/2015 2025:DHC:9960
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANGEETA
Respondent
HITESH KUMAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA 589/2015 SANGEETA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Kapoor, Adv. versus HITESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Dhyani, Ms. Kanchan Semwal and Ms. Somya Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGEMENT % 13.11.2025 1. The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), has been filed on behalf of the appellant/defendant/wife, i.e., Ms. Sangeeta, challenging the judgment and decree dated 26th May, 2015 (“impugned judgment”), passed by the Additional District Judge (“ADJ”)- 06, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Suit No. 581/2014, titled as “Sh. Hitesh Kumar Versus Ms. Sangeeta”. 2. By way of the said suit, the respondent/plaintiff/husband, i.e., Mr. Hitesh Kumar, had sought possession of the suit property, i.e., property bearing No. B-6, Shani Bazar Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059, admeasuring 65 sq. yards, along with damages and mesne profits. 3. The Trial Court, vide the impugned judgment, has granted a decree of possession of the suit property in favour of the respondent and has further awarded damages @ Rs. 3,000/- per month, from the date of institution of the suit till v