SANDEEP KUMAR vs KAPTAIN SINGH RATHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28.11.2025 + CM(M) 2308/2025, CM APPL. 74671/2025 & CM APPL. 74670/2025 SANDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Om Prakash Mishra and Mr. Mayank Pandey, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus KAPTAIN SINGH RATHI THROUGH LRS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has assailed orders dated 07.11.2025 and 18.11.2025 of the learned trial court. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the present petition is completely frivolous and filed with oblique purposes. 2. By way of order dated 07.11.2025, evidence of petitioner/defendant was closed as despite last and final opportunity granted on multiple occasions, no evidence was led. Thereafter, the petitioner/defendant filed an application under Section 151 CPC seeking reopening of the evidence of the defendant. That application was dismissed by way of detailed order dated CM(M) 2308/2025 Page 1 of 6 pages Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, Digitally Signed serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f By:NEETU N NAIR f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.11.28 17:15:04 -08'00' Signing Date:28.11.2025 17:26:37 18.11.2025. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner/defendant contends that the impugned orders are liable to be set aside in the interest of justice and petitioner/defendant deserves further opportunity to lead evidence. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner/defen